Porcelain Publishing / JHC / Volume 9 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspjhc2025090205
ARTICLE

The Illusory Opposition——On the Internal Relation between Phenomenal Concepts and Private Language

Fangfang Ma1
Show Less
1 School of Philosophy, Northwest University, Xi’an, China
Published: 31 December 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Abstract

There are two different interpretations in contemporary discussion of the relation between phenomenal concepts and private language: the radical position and the moderate position. The former holds that there exist pure phenomenal concepts which cannot be expressed in principle. The latter acknowledges that phenomenal concepts are expressible, but the words used to express them are private, and they are meaningful private language in an introspective-recognitional mode. However, purely phenomenal concepts, when situated within the background of public language, either become meaningless sounds or change into public language. The privacy of these words can also be corrected by the distinction between private and personal language. And the introspective-recognitional mode is finally revealed as the ability for the subject’s self-ascription by a quotational model. Therefore, the phenomenal concepts do not ultimately lead to any form of private language.

Keywords
Phenomenal concepts
Private language
Personal language
A quotational model
References

Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

 

Ball, D. (2009). There are no phenomenal concepts. Mind, 118(472), 935–962. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzp134

 

Block, N. (2007). Max Black’s objection to mind-body identity. In T. Alter & S. Walter (Eds.), Phenomenal concepts and phenomenal knowledge: New essays on consciousness and physicalism (pp. 249–306). Oxford University Press.

 

Balog, K. (2009). Phenomenal concepts. In B. McLaughlin, A. Beckermann, & S. Walter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind (pp. 292–312). Oxford University Press.

 

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.

 

Chalmers, D. J. (2003). The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief. In Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.), Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives (pp. 220–272). Oxford University Press.

 

Child, W. (2015). Wittgenstein and phenomenal concepts. In M. Campbell & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Wittgenstein and perception (pp. 84–103). Routledge.

 

Demircioglu, E. (2013). Physicalism and phenomenal concepts. Philosophical Studies, 165(1), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9959-7

 

Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and illusion: Themes in the philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.

 

Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960077

 

Levin, J. (2007). What is a phenomenal concept? In T. Alter & S. Walter (Eds.), Phenomenal concepts and phenomenal knowledge: New essays on consciousness and physicalism (pp. 87–110). Oxford University Press.

 

Loar, B. (1990). Phenomenal states. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 81–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214188

 

Loar, B. (1997). Phenomenal states. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Güzeldere (Eds.), The nature of consciousness: Philosophical debates (pp. 597–616). MIT Press.

 

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914

 

Papineau, D. (2002). Thinking about consciousness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243824.001.0001

 

Papineau, D. (2011). Phenomenal concepts and the private language argument. American Philosophical Quarterly, 48(2), 175–184. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23025086

 

Peacocke, C. (2008). Truly understood. Oxford University Press.

 

Perry, J. (2001). Knowledge, possibility, and consciousness. MIT Press.

 

Prinz, M., & Pris, F. I. (2013). Phenomenal concepts and Wittgenstein’s private language argument. In Papers of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium (pp. 326–328). Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.

 

Stoljar, D. (2005). Physicalism and phenomenal concepts. Mind & Language, 20(5), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00296.x

 

Stoljar, D. (2010). Physicalism. Routledge.

 

Stroud, B. (2000). Meaning, understanding, and practice: Philosophical essays. Oxford University Press.

 

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Harper & Row.

 

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. Wiley-Blackwell. (Original work published 1953)

 

 

 

 

Share
Back to top
Journal of Human Cognition, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5215 Print ISSN: 2515-4699, Published by Porcelain Publishing