Porcelain Publishing / JHC / Volume 9 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspjhc2025090204
ARTICLE

A Comparative Study on Modern Regularity Theory and Its Causal Cases

Mingxuan Song1
Show Less
1 Hebei University, China
Published: 31 December 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Abstract

In 2008 and 2013, Baumgartner successively proposed modern regularity theory of type causation and actual causation. In actual causation, he took Hitchcock’s (2001) causal model theory as a point of analogy. Drawing from Baumgartner’s existing discussions on the strengths of his approach, this paper compares the methods of Baumgartner and Hitchcock through providing an extended analysis of actual causation cases. I show that they define “active route” within the frameworks of regularity theory and counterfactual theory, respectively. From a technical perspective, modern regularity theory demonstrates stronger explanatory power in most cases by employing relatively straightforward tools. Philosophically, this approach offers a non-counterfactual analysis in type causation that rejects miracle.

Keywords
Regularity theory
Active route
Actual causation
Causal model
References

Mackie, J. L. (1974). The Cement of the Universe. A Study of Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

 

Graßhoff, G., & May, M. (2001). Causal regularities. In W. Spohn, M. Ledwig, & M. Esfeld (Eds.), Current issues in causation (PP. 85-114). Paderborn: Mentis.

 

Baumgartner, M. (2008). Regularity theories reassessed. Philosophia, 36, 327–354.

 

Baumgartner, M. (2009). Uncovering deterministic causal structures: a Boolean approach. Synthese, 170, 71-96.

 

Baumgartner, M. (2013). A Regularity Theoretic Approach to Actual Causation. Erkenntnis, 78, 85-109.

 

Lemmon, E. J. (1978). Beginning Logic. Indianapolis: Hackett.

 

Baumgartner, M. (2015). Parsimony and Causality. Quality & Quantity, 49, 839-856.

 

Hitchcock, C. (2013). What is the ‘Cause’ in Causal Decision Theory?. Erkenntnis, 78, 129-146.

 

Hitchcock, C. (2001). The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs. Journal of Philosophy, 98, 273-299.

 

Wu, X. (2020). Causal Models and Transitivity. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 42(08), 1-9.

 

Hall, N. (2000). Causation and the price of transitivity. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 199.

 

Hitchcock, C. (2007). Prevention, preemption, and the principle of sufficient reason. Philosophical Review, 116, 505.

 

Zhang, J. (2017). On the Minimization Principle in the Boolean Approach to Causal Discovery. In Chin-Mu Yang, Kok Yong Lee, and Hiroakira Ono (Eds.), Philosophical Logic: Current Trends in Asia (PP. 86). Springer.

 

Hall, N. (2004). Two concepts of causation. In John Collins, Ned Hall & Laurie Paul (Eds.). Causation and Counterfactuals (PP. 225-276). MIT Press.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Human Cognition, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5215 Print ISSN: 2515-4699, Published by Porcelain Publishing