Porcelain Publishing / JHC / Volume 8 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20240802
Cite this article
1
Download
72
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Ethical Research on Artificial Perception Technologies 

Hao Wang1
Show Less
1 School of Philosophy, Shanxi University
Published: 17 December 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

The development of artificial perception technologies has surpassed the limitations of human natural senses, expanding humanity's perspectives on the world and self-awareness. However, it has simultaneously introduced new ethical challenges. These emerging challenges necessitate a philosophical reexamination of concepts such as 'nature,' 'artificial,' and ' invasiveness ' to better address associated issues. The advancement of artificial perception technologies not only involves scientific and practical applications but also profoundly influences human values, social ethics, and the future trajectory of human civilization. Amidst the current transformation and transition in modes of cognition, reevaluating the relationship between technology and humanity becomes a crucial task.

Keywords
Artificial sense; Artefact; Brain-computer interface; Invasive
References
[1]肖峰.人工感知:人类认知新形态及哲学新问题[J].探索与争鸣,2022,No.397(11):122-131+179-180.
[2]J R Wolpaw, N Birbaumer, WJ McFarland. Brain-Computer Interface Technology: A review of the first international meeting[J]. IEEETrans-action on Rehabilitation Engineering,8(2),2000, pp.164-173.
[3]Rao R.P.N.2013. Brain-computer interfacing: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.pp.172.[4]魏屹东.混合认知:一种优化的人工智能适应性表征策略[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,52(1):81-93.
[5]Bianchini F. A New Definition of "Artificial" for Two Artificial Sciences[J]. Found Sci 28,2023, pp.401–417.[6]Williams B.1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.129.
[7]Reich, L. et al.(2011).'A ventral visual stream reading center independent of visual experience'.Current Biology,21,363-8
[8]D. Grady. The vision thing: Mainly in the brain[J]. Discover,1993,14(6):56–66.
[9]王孝清.当代知觉哲学问题研究[D].山西大学,2022.pp.155
[10]Neville, H. J.& Lawson, D.(1987).'Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task:an event-related potential and behavioral study.II.Congenitally deaf adults'.Brain Research,405,268- 83
[11]Bull R.,Rathborn, H.& Clifford, B. R.(1983).'The voice-recognition accuracy of blind listeners'.Perception,12,223-6
[12]Jones B.(1975).'Spatial perception in the blind'.British Journal of Psychology,66,461-472.
[13]Calvert G. A.,Campbell R.&Brammer, M.J.(2000).'Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex'. Current Biology,10,649-57.
[14]安东尼奥·R.达马西奥:《感受发生的一切——意识产生中的身体和情绪》[M].杨韶刚译,教育科学出版社,2007年,pp.114
[15]Carmen Vidaurre and Benjamin Blankertz, "Towards a cure for BCI illiteracy" [J], Brain Topography, vol.23(no.2),2010,194.
[16]Bluhm R., M. Cortright, E. D. Achtyes, and L. Y. Cabrera.2021. "They are invasive in different ways.": Stakeholders' perceptions of the invasiveness of psychiatric electroceutical interventions. AJOB Neuroscience 1–12.
[17]Bonaci T., R. Calo, and H. J. Chizeck.2014. App stores for the brain: Privacy & security in Brain-Computer Interfaces.In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering (pp.1–7). IEEE.
[18]Goering S., A. Wexler, and E. Klein.2021. Trading vulnerabilities: living with Parkinson's Disease before and after deep brain stimulation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30(4):623–630.
[19]魏屹东.认知哲学手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2020:510.
[20]关于加强科技伦理治理的意见[N].人民日报,2022-03-21(001)
 
 
Share
Back to top
Journal of Human Cognition, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5215 Print ISSN: 2515-4699, Published by Porcelain Publishing