What Is Scientific Misunderstanding?
We present the negative phenomena of understanding in relation to scientific explanations. We begin by formulating the distinction between genuine understanding and lack of understanding, to define the epistemic category of misunderstanding. We illustrate misunderstanding with a short meta-philosophical study on the current debates about distinctively mathematical explanations.
[1] Ammalainen A., & Moroshkina N. (2021). The effect of true and false unreportable hints on anagram problem solving, restructuring, and the Aha!-experience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6–7), 644–658. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/20445911.2020.1844722
[2] Bangu S. (2021). Mathematical explanations of physical phenomena. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 99(4), 669– 682. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1822895
[3] Baumberger C., Beisbart C., & Brun G. (2017). What is scientific understanding? An overview of recent debates in epistemology and philosophy of science. In S. R. Grimm, C. Baumberger, & S. Ammon (Eds.), Explaining understanding: New perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 1–34). Routledge-Taylor & Francis.
[4] Bueno O., & Colyvan M. (2011). An inferential conception of the application of mathematics. Noûs, 45(2), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00772.x
[5] de Regt H. W. (2017). Understanding scientific understanding. Oxford University Press.
[6] Dellsén F. (2020). Beyond explanation: Understanding as dependency modelling. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4), 1261–1286. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy058
[7] Dutilh Novaes C. (2020). The dialogical roots of deduction: Historical, cognitive, and philosophical perspectives on reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
[8] Elgin C. Z. (2017). True enough. MIT Press.
[9] Grimmer H., Laukkonen R., Tangen J., & Von Hippel W. (2022). Eliciting false insights with semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02049-x
[10] Hardcastle, G. (n.d.). A problem-solving account of scientific explanation [Manuscript]. https://philpapers.org/archive/ HARAPA-7.pdf
[11] Hempel C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. The Free Press.
[12] Keil F. C. (2006). Explanation and understanding. Annu Rev Psychol. 57, 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev. psych.57.102904.190100
[13] Khalifa K. (2013). The role of explanation in understanding. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(1), 161 –187. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axr057
[14] Khalifa K. (2017). Understanding, explanation, and scientific knowledge (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/9781108164276
[15] Khalifa K. (2023). Should friends and frenemies of understanding be friends? Discussing de Regt. In I. Lawler, K. Khalifa, & E. Shech (Eds.), Scientific understanding and representation: Modeling in the physical sciences (pp. 33–50). Routledge.
[16] Kitcher P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 13) (pp. 410–505). University of Minnesota Press.
[17] Kounios J., & Beeman M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154
[18] Kvanvig J. L. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge University Press.
[19] Lange M. (2013). What makes a scientific explanation distinctively mathematical? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(3), 485–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs012
[20] Lange M. (2018). A reply to Craver and Povich on the directionality of distinctively mathematical explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 67, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.002
[21] Mantzavinos C. (2016). Explanatory pluralism. Cambridge university press.
[22] Salvi C., Bricolo E., Kounios J., Bowden E., & Beeman M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798
[23] Schultz P. W., & Searleman A. (2002). Rigidity of thought and behavior: 100 years of research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128(2), 165–207.
[24] van Fraassen, Bas. C. (1980). The scientific image (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198244274.001.0001