Porcelain Publishing / JHC / Volume 7 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469903.20230701
Cite this article
1
Download
95
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Epigenetic Inheritance and the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis

Qiaoying Lu1
Show Less
1 Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Peking University, Beijing
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Advocates of Extended Evolutionary Synthesis claim that the gene-centric framework of Modern Synthesis (MS) inadequately addresses epigenetics and extended heredity. Historically, epigenetic inheritance relates to Lamarck's inheritance of acquired characters, which was widely accepted before the dominance of MS. In this talk, I argue that the challenge posed by epigenetic inheritance to the gene-centric view arises partly from the ambiguous use of "gene," "phenotype," and "environment" concepts. A functional analysis of the gene concept played in the formal evolutionary models shows that the gene can include materials like exogenes, demonstrating the flexibility of evolutionary theory beyond the verbal MS. Properly understanding the evolutionary gene concept reveals that incorporating epigenetic inheritance does not demand a radical revision of the contemporary evolutionary theory.

Keywords
Gene-centric view; Modern Synthesis; Evolutionary Gene; Molecular Gene
References

[1] Aristotle. 1943. Generation of animals (A. L. Peck, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

[2] Buranyi S. 2022, June 28. Do we need a new theory of evolution? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/ science/2022/jun/28/do-we-need-a-new-theory-of-evolution

[3] Burkhardt R. W. 2013. Lamarck, Evolution, and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters. Genetics, 194(4), 793–805.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.151852

[4] Darwin C. 1859. The Origin of Species. London: John Murray.

[5] Darwin C. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. Cambridge University Press. CHAPTER  XXVII, PART11.

[6] Dawkins R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. Oxford University Press.

[7] Dias B. G. and Ressler K. J. 2014. Parental Olfactory Experience Influences Behavior and Neural Structure in  Subsequent Generations. Nature Neuroscience, 17: 89–96.

[8] Futuyma D. J. 2006. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

[9] Gissis S., Jablonka E., and Zeligowski A. (Eds.). 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular  biology. MIT Press.

[10] Godfrey-Smith P. 2007. Conditions for Evolution by Natural Selection. The Journal of Philosophy, 104: 489–516.

[11] Griffiths P. E. and Neumann-Held E. M. 1999. The Many Faces of the Gene. BioScience, 49: 656–62.

[12] Griffiths P. E., and Gray R. D. 2000. Darwinism and developmental systems. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, & R. D. Gray  (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 195–218). MIT Press.

[13] Griffiths P. E. and Stotz K. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

[14] Haig D. 2004. The (Dual) Origin of Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 69: 67–70.

[15] Haig D. 2007. Weismann rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biology & Philosophy, 22(3), 415-428.

[16] Haig D. 2012. The Strategic Gene. Biology and Philosophy, 27: 461–79. 

[17] Jablonka E. and Lamb M. J. 1995. Epigenetic Inheritance and the Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[18] Jablonka E., Lamb M. J., and Zeligowski A. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions, revised edition: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. MIT Press.

[19] Kutschera U., and Hossfeld U. 2013. Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913): The forgotten co-founder of the NeoDarwinian theory of biological evolution. Theory in Biosciences = Theorie in Den Biowissenschaften, 132(4), 207– 214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0187-2

[20] Laland K. N., Uller T., Feldman M., Sterelny K., Müller G. B., Moczek A., Jablonka E., and Odling- Smee J. 2014. Does  evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature, 514(7521), 161.

[21] Lu, Q. Bourrat, P. 2018. The Evolutionary Gene and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. British Journal for the  Philosophy of Science, 69: 775–800.

[22] Merlin F. 2010. Evolutionary Chance Mutation: A Defense of the Modern Synthesis' Consensus View. Philosophy and  Theory in Biology, 2: e103.

[23] Morgan H. D., Sutherland H. G., Martin D. I. and Whitelaw E. 1999. Epigenetic Inheritance at the Agouti Locus in the  Mouse. Nature Genetics, 23: 314–18.

[24] Morgan T. H. 1935. The Relation of Genetics to Physiology and Medicine. Scientific Monthly, 41:5–18.

[25] Pigliucci M. and Muller G. 2010. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[26] Rassoulzadegan M., Grandjean V., Gounon P., Vincent S., Gillot I. and Cuzin, F. 2006. RNA-Mediated Non-Mendelian  Inheritance of an Epigenetic Change in the Mouse. Nature, 441: 469–74.

[27] Waddington C. H. 1942. The Epigenotype. Endevor, 1: 18–20.

[28] Weismannn A. 1893. The Germ-Plasm: A Theory of Heredity. New York: Scribner.

[29] Youngson N. A. and Whitelaw E. 2008. Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects, Annual Review of Genomics and  Human Genetics, 9: 233–57.

[30] Zirkle C. 1935. The Inheritance of Acquired Characters and the Provisional Hypothesis of Pangen

Share
Back to top
Journal of Human Cognition, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5215 Print ISSN: 2515-4699, Published by Porcelain Publishing