Porcelain Publishing / JHC / Volume 5 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20210502
ARTICLE

Kant's Transcendental Definition of Pleasure and Displeasure

Lixuan Gong1
Show Less
1 Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

This essay explores the meaning of Kant's transcendental definition of pleasure and displeasure. I will explain the meaning of "definition" and "transcendental" respectively in relation to the feeling of pleasure and displeasure, contrasting with the interpretations of Guyer (2018) and Deimling (2018). Not only will I show how they are wrong, but I will also offer reasons for their misinterpretations. This essay proposes that the transcendental definition of pleasure and displeasure bears more systematic significance in Kant's philosophy than previous researchers might have thought. My analysis also leads back to Kant's conception of the anthropological relation between life, desire, and pleasure.

Keywords
Transcendental; Definition; Feeling of pleasure and displeasure; Life; Desire
References

[1]Allison,H.E.(2001).Kant's Theory of Taste:a Reading of the Critique ofAesthetic Judgement[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

[2]Allison,H.E.(2003).Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg[J].Inquiry,46(2):182-194.

[3]Caygill,H.(1995).A Kant Dictionary[M].Oxford:Blackwell Publishing.

[4]Cohen A.(2019).A Kantian Account of Emotions as Feelings[J].Mind,129(514):429-460.

[5]Deimling,W.(2018).Two Different Kinds of Value?[C]//In D.Williamson& K.Sorensen(Eds.)Kant and the Faculty of Feeling.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.

[6]DeWitt J.(2014).Respect for the Moral Law:the Emotional Side of Reason[J].Philosophy,89(1):31-62.

[7]Falduto,A.(2014).The Faculties of the Human Mind and the Case of MoralFeeling in Kant’s Philosophy[M].Berlin/Boston:Walter De Gruyter.

[8]Frierson P. (2016).Kantian Feeling:Empirical Psychology,TranscendentalCritique,and Phenomenology[J].Con-Textos Kantianos,3:353-371.

[9]Frierson,P. (2016).Towards a Transcendental Critique of Feeling[J].Con-Textos Kantianos,3:381-390.

[10]Ginsborg H.(2017).In Defence of the One-Act View:Reply to Guyer[J].The British Journal of Aesthetics,57(4):421-435.

[11]Ginsborg,H.(2003).Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure[J].Inquiry,46(2):164-181.

[12]Guyer P.(1997).Kant and the Claims of Taste[M].Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.

[13]Guyer,P.(2017).One Act or Two?Hannah Ginsborg on Aesthetic Judgement[J].The British Journal of Aesthetics,57(4):407-419.

[14]Guyer,P.(2018).What Is It Like to Experience the Beautiful and Sublime[C]//In D.Williamson & K.Sorensen(Eds.)Kant and the Faculty of Feeling.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

[15]Shier D.(1998).Why Kant finds nothing ugly[J].The British Journal ofAesthetics,38(4):412-418.

[16]Sorensen K.D.(2002).Kant's Taxonomy of the Emotions[J].Kantian Review,6:109-128.

[17]Wenzel C. (1999).Kant finds nothing ugly? [J].The British Journal ofAesthetics,39(4):416-422.

[18]Nuzzo,A.(2014).The Place of the Emotions in Kant’s TranscendentalPhilosophy[C]//in A.Cohen(Eds)Kant on Emotion and Value.Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillian.

 

Share
Back to top
Journal of Human Cognition, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5215 Print ISSN: 2515-4699, Published by Porcelain Publishing