Porcelain Publishing / JHC / Volume 4 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20200402
ARTICLE

Mental Causation, Exclusive Argument, and Non-reductive Physicalism

Xiaoyang Wang1 Yucheng Wang2
Show Less
1 Department of philosophy,Xiamen Fujian, 361005
2 Lecturer of Xidian University, Xi'an Shanxi, 710018
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Jeagwon Kim's exclusion argument is a well-known argument against non-reductive physicalism in the contemporary debate on mental causation. In this essay, we will first discuss two versions of the exclusion argument: the simple version and the sophisticated version. Secondly, we will take a conservative strategy to defend the kind of non-reductive physicalism initiated by Donald Davidson: the Token Identity Theory. Namely, we will explain where Kim failed to appropriately understand Davidson's work and argue that the simple version and the sophisticated version of the exclusion argument won't work against the clarified token identity theory at all. Lastly, Since much of Kim's inappropriate interpretation of Davidson's work is rooted in their difference in metaphysics, there is reason to believe the proper understanding and evaluation on contemplation as such on mental causation, non-reductive physicalism, and other related problems can't be achieved without finding an appropriate metaphysical frame.

Keywords
Mental causation; Exclusion argument; Non-reductive physicalism; Token identity theory; Philosophy of mind
References

[1]Xiaoyang W.A Posteriori Physicalism and Explanatory Gap:A StretchedAnalysis of Brian Loar's Phenomenal Concept Strategy[J].World Philosophy,2013,4,91-103

[2]Xiaoyang W,Yucheng W.Anomalous Monism Reconsidered:A New Per‐spective on Mind-Body Token Identity Theory and Mind-Body Superve‐nience[J].Journal of Dialectice of Nature,2013,35(3),51-59

[3]Crane T.Elements of mind:An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2001.

[4]Foster L,Swanson J W.Experience and theory[M].Cambridge:University ofMassachusetts Press,1970

[5]Essays on Actions and Events[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2002.

[6]Fodor J.Psychological Explanation[M].New York:Random House,1968

[7]Gibb S C.Mental Causation and Ontology[M].Oxford:Oxford UniversityPress,2013.

[8]Heil J,Mele A.Mental Causation[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1993.

[9]Kim J.Supervenience and Mind:Selected philosophical Essays[M].NewYork:Cambridge University Press,1993

[10]Physicalism,or Something Near Enough[M].Princeton:Princeton Univer‐sity Press,2005

[11]Philosophy of Mind[M].New York:Westview Press,2011.

[12]Stoljar D.Physicalism[M].London:New York:Routledge,2010.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Human Cognition, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5215 Print ISSN: 2515-4699, Published by Porcelain Publishing